Elon Musk spent three days testifying in a high-stakes trial alleging OpenAI abandoned its founding nonprofit mission. His performance under scrutiny exposed several key stumbles that may jeopardize his claims.
- Musk conceded key points under OpenAI’s cross-examination
- His testimony included contradictions and evasion
- Musk’s temper and knowledge gaps were highlighted on the stand
What happened
Elon Musk took the stand for the third day in a trial accusing OpenAI of abandoning its nonprofit mission to pursue a public offering. Musk’s legal team argues that OpenAI misused millions in donations and plans to enrich insiders rather than benefit humanity. However, OpenAI and its investors say Musk, who left the organization, is now trying to undermine his rival out of jealousy and competitive frustration.
During his testimony, Musk faced aggressive cross-examination from OpenAI’s lawyer William Savitt, a former ally turned adversary. Savitt presented documents and previous statements that contradicted Musk’s testimony, pushing him to admit to previously denied facts. Musk also struggled to explain or defend some of his accusations, leading to moments where the judge reprimanded him for sarcasm and evasiveness.
Why it matters
This trial has major implications for the future structure of OpenAI, which plans to go public later in 2026 with a valuation in the hundreds of billions. If Musk’s case succeeds, it could prevent OpenAI from transitioning to a for-profit entity and ensure it remains a nonprofit organization as originally founded.
Beyond the legal stakes, the trial underscores the intense rivalry in the AI industry, with Musk’s own AI company, xAI, struggling to keep pace. The credibility issues and admissions during Musk’s testimony may hurt his legal position and public perception, potentially allowing OpenAI to advance its business plans with fewer obstacles.
What to watch next
The trial will continue with further testimony and evidence. Observers should watch for how the judge and jury respond to Musk’s performance on the stand and whether OpenAI can maintain its defense that Musk’s lawsuit is primarily a competitive tactic rather than a principled legal complaint.
Additionally, any revelations about Musk’s connections or motivations, including his public persona and political ties, may influence the trial’s outcome. The eventual ruling will set a precedent for governance and control of large AI organizations amid growing public and regulatory scrutiny.